Multispectral Observations of Float Rocks Used to Investigate the Origin of Boulders on the Western Jezero Fan Front, Mars
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Mars 2020 Perseverance rover has explored the escarpment at the front of the western fan in Jezero crater, Mars, where it encountered a variety of rock units as in-place outcrops and as loose pieces of rock separated from outcrops, or “float” rocks. Comparing float rocks to in-place outcrops can provide key insights into the crater’s erosional history and the diversity of units in the Jezero watershed that the Perseverance rover cannot visit in-situ. Here, we used multispectral observations from Perseverance’s Mastcam-Z instrument to investigate the lithology and origin of float rocks found on the western Jezero fan front (sols 415-707). We identified four textural classes of float rocks (conglomerates, layered, massive, and light-toned) and investigated their physical characteristics, spectral properties, and distribution to interpret their source and constrain their mode of transport. We found that the conglomerate and layered float rocks are highly spectrally variable and altered with differing ferric and ferrous signatures, and they likely derived from local sedimentary outcrops in the western fan front. Massive float rocks are the least altered, exhibit ferrous signatures, and could have derived from local outcrop sources or more distal sources in the Jezero watershed. Massive float rocks separate into two subclasses: massive olivine and massive pyroxene, which likely derived from the regional olivine-carbonate-bearing watershed unit and the crustal Noachian basement unit respectively. The unique light-toned float rocks have variable hydration and low Fe-abundance, but there are no local outcrop equivalent of these rocks in the western Jezero fan or crater floor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".