MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403130270 · doi:10.1115/1.4066784

Methodology for Modeling Nonlinear Thermomechanical Response With Wear at High-Speed Interactions: Application to a Pin–Disk Configuration

2024· article· en· W4403130270 on OpenAlexaff
Soufiane Pontonnier, Samuel Quaegebeur, Fabrice Thouverez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTribology and Lubrication Engineering
Canadian institutionsSafran Electronics (Canada)
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsRubbingFinite element methodAxial symmetryMechanicsRotor (electric)Transient (computer programming)Rotational speedMechanical engineeringAerodynamicsCoupling (piping)PhysicsStructural engineeringComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An aircraft engine is a complex structure for which some components can come into contact at high speed. Modeling this behavior is very complex as multiple physics must be considered. State-of-the-art methodologies usually account for permanent contact and thermal modeling. In this paper, a new approach is proposed and embeds various phenomena such as nonregular and nonlinear contact mechanics, surface rubbing, wear, and nonlinear heat transfer. A nonlinear version of Moreau–Jean algorithm is employed to compute the transient response of the system and to capture accurately the contact dynamics. Moreover, the full nonlinear coupling between the dynamics and the heating process is taken into account through both a semi-analytical formulation and the finite element (FE) method. At the contact interface, heat flux is generated by dry rubbing and flows into both interacting bodies. The heat flux partition is evaluated thanks to a coefficient that depends on the material properties of the solids in contact. The proposed method also accounts for the adhesive wear between the solids through an energetic approach. This methodology is applied to an academic, yet realistic, disk connected to a rotor shaft that is free to move axially and to rotate around its revolution axis. Gyroscopic effects and variation of the rotation velocity are included leading to a full nonlinear mechanical behavior. The disk undergoes aerodynamic load moving it to contact with a clamped free pin. The rotor shaft and the pin are both modeled as one-dimensional (1D) elastic bodies, while the rotor disk is assumed to be rigid. Through this example, the developed strategy shows its potential to compute the complete transient highly nonlinear response of the breaking phenomenon, in an acceptable time simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and PowerSame topicTribology and Lubrication EngineeringFrench-language works237,207