Improving Charge Transport and Environmental Stability of Carbohydrate‐Bearing Semiconducting Polymers in Organic Field‐Effect Transistors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Semiconducting polymers offer synthetic tunability, good mechanical properties, and biocompatibility, enabling the development of soft technologies previously inaccessible. Side‐chain engineering is a versatile approach for optimizing these semiconducting materials, but minor modifications can significantly impact material properties and device performance. Carbohydrate side chains have been previously introduced to improve the solubility of semiconducting polymers in greener solvents. Despite this achievement, these materials exhibit suboptimal performance and stability in field‐effect transistors. In this work, structure–property relationships are explored to enhance the device performance of carbohydrate‐bearing semiconducting polymers. Toward this objective, a series of isoindigo‐based polymers with carbohydrate side chains of varied carbon‐spacer lengths is developed. Material and device characterizations reveal the effects of side chain composition on solid‐state packing and device performance. With this new design, charge mobility is improved by up to three orders of magnitude compared to the previous studies. Processing–property relationships are also established by modulating annealing conditions and evaluating device stability upon air exposure. Notably, incidental oxygen‐doping effects lead to increased charge mobility after 10 days of exposure to ambient air, correlated with decreased contact resistance. Bias stress stability is also evaluated. This work highlights the importance of understanding structure–property relationships toward the optimization of device performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".