MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403133231 · doi:10.18697/ajfand.134.25045

Nutritional status of preschool children (aged 24 to 59 months) and chickpea production and consumption in Ethiopia

2024· article· en· W4403133231 on OpenAlexfundno aff
RT Asrat, Mekonnen Girma, Eskinder Tafesse, SJ Whiting, CJ Henry

Bibliographic record

VenueAfrican Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGlobal Affairs CanadaInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsConsumption (sociology)Environmental healthMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Child under-nutrition is a major public health concern in developing countries including Ethiopia. Poor quality diet is the major determinant factor contributing to child undernutrition. Pulse crop production and consumption can improve children’s nutrient quality and dietary diversity. This study aimed to compare the nutritional status and child health, dietary intake, and wealth index of preschool children among pulse crop producer and non-producer families in Ethiopia. The study hypothesized that children living in families who grew pulses and consumed pulses (rather than selling their crop) would have better nutritional status due to availability of this protein-rich food source. A cross-sectional survey was conducted to determine demographic background, child feeding and caring practice and varieties and amount of pulse crop produced at the household level. A simple random sampling technique was used to select a sample of 432 children aged 24-59 months from central Ethiopia the Data was entered to SPSS v 20, WHO Anthro-plus software used to calculate the anthropometry indices, child dietary intake, level of chickpea production and consumption and wealth index, were computed using logistic regression. Chickpea (cicer arietinum L) was produced by 55.3% of the participants. Most (60.7%) of the children from chickpea producer families were high pulse consumers whereas only 15.5% of children from non-producers were high chickpea consumers (the difference in proportion is significant at p-value<0.001). Close to 60 % of the children of the non-producer families had a low dietary diversity score (that is <3) compared with 18.8 % from the producer families (p-value <0.001). The study revealed that nutritional status of children in both producer and non-producer families were 41.0 % stunted, 16.1 % underweight and 6.1 % wasted. Stunting and underweight were significantly inversely associated with chickpea production at p-value <0.001whereas for chickpea consumption, both stunting and underweight was significant at P < 0.05. However, wasting was not significantly associated with either production or consumption of chickpeas. In conclusion, chickpea production and consumption by families had a positive relationship with nutritional status of children. The authors recommend that engaging smallholder farmers in both chickpea production and consumption has potential in improving the dietary diversity and in turn benefit nutritional status of preschool children at the household level and therefore supporting smallholder farmer in chickpea production and consumption will help to contribute to decreasing the prevalence of under nutrition in the country. Key words: chickpea, preschool children, chickpea consumption, chickpea production, nutritional status

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAfrican Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and DevelopmentSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207