Neoplastic material inducing acute limb ischemia during bilobectomy surgery for the treatment of lung cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Acute limb ischemia caused by neoplastic embolism after bilobectomy surgery is rare but highly morbid. • Emergent vascular surgery consultation is essential in all cases of acute limb ischemia. • Routine pathological examination of all thrombectomy material should be standard to identify potential tumor embolism. Arterial tumor embolization is a severe but rare complication in lung cancer, especially during surgical interventions. We present the case of acute lower limb ischemia developed during a bilobectomy surgery for non-small cell lung carcinoma. Postoperative embolectomy was performed after a CT angiogram identified an occlusive thrombus in the left common iliac artery. Pathological analysis confirmed non-small cell lung carcinoma within the thrombus. Despite successful surgery, the patient later developed cerebral metastasis and chose medical assistance in dying. This case underscores the importance of adopting an open revascularization approach for patients suspected of acute arterial occlusion caused by intraluminal tumors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".