MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403149278 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvae163.839

9358 Maternal Blood Glucose And Hypothalamus Volume: Novel Insights For Intergenerational Transmission Of Endocrine Traits

2024· article· en· W4403149278 on OpenAlexaff
Cédrik Marchildon, Mélina Arguin, Myriam Doyon, Samantha Côté, Andréanne Michaud, Julia Huck, Véronique Gingras, Patrice Perron, Marie‐France Hivert, Luigi Bouchard, Kevin Whittingstall

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-JeanUniversité de SherbrookeCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocrine systemHypothalamusEndocrinologyInternal medicineBiologyVolume (thermodynamics)Blood volumeMedicineHormonePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: C. Marchildon: None. M. Arguin: None. M. Doyon: None. S. Cote: None. A. Michaud: None. J. Huck: None. V. Gingras: None. P. Perron: None. M. Hivert: None. L. Bouchard: None. K. Whittingstall: None. Objective: Several studies have linked maternal hyperglycaemia to diabetes-prone phenotype in the offspring, yet the mechanisms underlying these associations remain unclear. In adults, the hypothalamus is known to play a crucial role in the progression of obesity and diabetes. In utero exposure to maternal hyperglycaemia may thus selectively target the developing hypothalamus. To test this hypothesis, we explored the link between maternal glycemia and offspring brain volumes at 10-12-year-old. Methods: This study was conducted in a subgroup of 48 mother-child pairs from the Gen3G prospective pre-birth cohort. Pregnant women completed a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-30 weeks of pregnancy. Maternal glucose was measured at fasting, 1h, and 2h during the OGTT and area-under-the curve of glucose (AUCgluc) was calculated using the trapezoid method. When participating offspring reached 12 years of age, they were invited back to the clinical research centre to complete a high-resolution structural MRI from which regional brain volumes and hypothalamic subvolumes were quantified using FreeSurfer (Fisch, 2012). Results: Participating mothers were 28.6 (± 4.4) years old at enrolment, their mean BMI was 25.3 (± 6.3) kg/m2, and 6 women had gestational diabetes diagnosed from the IADPSG criteria. At follow-up, offspring were 10.9 (± 0.4) years old, and mean BMI was 18.3 (± 3.3) kg/m2. Our investigation revealed a significant and positive correlation between maternal AUCgluc and total offspring hypothalamic volume (r = 0.41, p = 0.004, n = 48). No significant correlations were observed in other cortical and sub-cortical regions (all p>=0.05). The link between maternal AUCgluc and hypothalamic volume was considerably stronger in female offspring (r = 0.54, p = 0.008, n = 23) than in males (r = 0.26, p = 0.22, n = 25). Conclusions: We found an association between higher maternal glycemia and greater offspring hypothalamic volumes, particularly among females. These results suggest that prenatal exposure to hyperglycaemia may lead to hypothalamic programming in a sex-dependent manner. Considering that recent studies have linked the hypothalamic disturbances to endocrine dysregulation, our findings may lead to a new understanding of obesity and the intergenerational transmission of endocrine traits. Ref:Fischl B. Freesurfer. NeuroImage. 2012 Aug 10;62(2): 774-81. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 Presentation: 6/2/2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine Society→Same topicBirth, Development, and Health→French-language works237,207→