Mechanisms for assembly of the nucleoplasmic reticulum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The nuclear envelope consists of an outer membrane connected to the endoplasmic reticulum, an inner membrane facing the nucleoplasm and a perinuclear space separating the two bilayers. The inner and outer nuclear membranes are physically connected at nuclear pore complexes that mediate selective communication and transfer of materials between the cytoplasm and nucleus. The spherical shape of the nuclear envelope is maintained by counterbalancing internal and external forces applied by cyto- and nucleo-skeletal networks, and the nuclear lamina and chromatin that underly the inner nuclear membrane. Despite its apparent rigidity, the nuclear envelope can invaginate to form an intranuclear membrane network termed the nucleoplasmic reticulum (NR) consisting of Type-I NR contiguous with the inner nuclear membrane and Type-II NR containing both the inner and outer nuclear membranes. The NR extends deep into the nuclear interior potentially facilitating communication and exchanges between the nuclear interior and the cytoplasm. This review details the evidence that NR intrusions that regulate cytoplasmic communication and genome maintenance are the result of a dynamic interplay between membrane biogenesis and remodelling, and physical forces exerted on the nuclear lamina derived from the cyto- and nucleo-skeletal networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".