MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403150336 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvae163.1146

12502 Bdnf Production by Kiss1 Neurons Acts in a Sexually Dependent Way to Control Sexual Development and Energy Balance in Female and Male Mice

2024· article· en· W4403150336 on OpenAlexaff
Ariane Maria Zanesco, Jonathan Ferreira, Fernando Valdivieso‐Rivera, Ana Laura Nicoletti Carvalho, Natália Ferreira Mendes, Carlos H. Sponton, Renata Frazão, Lı́cio A. Velloso

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSexual Differentiation and Disorders
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBalance (ability)Energy balanceProduction (economics)Internal medicineEndocrinologyPsychologyNeuroscienceBiologyMedicineEconomicsEcologyMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: A.M. Zanesco: None. D. Cabral: None. J. Ferreira: None. F. Valdivieso-Rivera: None. A.L. Carvalho: None. N. Mendes: None. C. Sponton: None. R. Frazao: None. L.A. Velloso: None. The hypothalamus is a key region in the central nervous system that controls different functions such as energy balance, thermogenesis, and reproduction. Kiss1 neurons integrate two distinct neuronal pathways, reproduction, and energy balance, both essential to species survival and maintenance. Recent studies, identify that the Brain-derived neurotrophic factor, BDNF produced by neurons and astrocytes in the hypothalamus is essential to control homeostatic and hedonic feeding by acting in specific groups of hypothalamic neurons. No studies showed the action of BDNF produced in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) of the hypothalamus. Using single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of data obtained from mice hypothalamus reveals that Kiss1 neurons express BDNF and we confirmed this result by immunofluorescence assay. Curiously, there is more expression of BDNF in the female hypothalamus compared with the male hypothalamus. But, when we selected specifically the BDNF produced by KISS1 neurons, this difference disappears. Based on that, we used a Cre-loxP approach to selectively knockout BDNF in Kiss1 neurons and identify the changes in sexual development and energy balance in female and male mice. All experiments were approved by the Animal Use Ethics Committee of UNICAMP (CEUA: 5591-1/2020 and CIBio 04/2021). All female and male mice were evaluated daily to identify their sexual development. We identified no changes in metabolic parameters, such as body weight and adiposity in male and female mice fed on a chow diet. Additionally, BDNF ablation in Kiss1 neurons (BDNF-KO) leaded to a premature vaginal opening, a decreased in uterus and ovary weight, and compromises the regular cyclicity of the estrus cycle in females. No difference was found in the sexual development of male mice, indicating that this effect is sexually dependent. Based on the fact that BDNF produced in VMH and DMH acts as anorexigenic effects, and Kiss1 neurons integrate the neuronal pathway responsible for energy balance, we decided to investigate the effects of BDNF ablation in Kiss1 neurons in female and male mice fed on high-fat diet. Interestingly, male mice without BDNF production in Kiss neurons were protected from obesity development compared with wild-type mice, both fed on a high-fat diet. When they were fed on a chow diet, male BDNF-KO mice, exhibited hyperphagia compared to control mice, showing a disruption in control of food intake and body weight maintenance. No differences were identified in body weight gain, food intake, and adiposity in BDNF-KO female mice. Based on that, we conclude that BDNF produced by Kiss1 exerts different functions in male and female mice. In females, it is more related to sexual development, and males in control of energy balance. This is the first research showing the BDNF production by Kiss1 neurons and its dimorphism effects on male and female mice. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score0.287

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicSexual Differentiation and DisordersFrench-language works237,207