MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403150507 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvae163.1505

8428 Rare Variants in the MECP2 Gene in Two Boys with Central Precocious Puberty

2024· article· en· W4403150507 on OpenAlexaff
Ana Pinheiro Machado Canton, Jacobo Buelvas Mebarak, Melissa Magnuson, Stephanie Roberts, Nelly Mauras, Matthew D. Benson, Selma F. Witchel, Rona S. Carroll, Ana Cláudia Latronico, Ursula B. Kaiser, Ana Paula Abreu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCentral precocious pubertyPrecocious pubertyMECP2PediatricsGeneMedicineEndocrinologyGeneticsInternal medicineBiologyHormonePhenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: A.P. Canton: None. J.B. Mebarak: None. M. Magnuson: None. S. Roberts: None. N. Mauras: None. M. Benson: None. S. Witchel: None. R.S. Carroll: None. A. Latronico: None. U.B. Kaiser: None. A. Abreu: None. Introduction: Central precocious puberty (CPP) occurs more frequently in girls and is usually labelled as idiopathic; however, in boys organic causes are more frequent. Identification of imprinted genes causing CPP have revealed epigenetic mechanisms underlying puberty. MECP2, an X-linked gene, encodes a methylated DNA reader protein with a role in gene transcription. MECP2 loss-of-function mutations usually cause Rett syndrome, a severe neurodevelopmental disorder that may be associated with early pubertal development. Recently, rare variants in MECP2 have been recognized in girls with sporadic CPP with or without mild neurodevelopmental disorders. In our cohort of 78 patients with idiopathic CPP, no MECP2 mutations were identified in 73 girls. In this study, five boys with CPP were evaluated for potential MECP2 sequence variants. Methods and Results: Five boys with CPP were screened for MECP2 sequence variants using Sanger sequencing. At the time of CPP diagnosis, they had median (interquartile range) chronological age 9.2 yr (4.3), bone age advancement 2.1 yr (3.5), height SDS 2.3 (1.5), basal LH levels 1.6 IU/L (0.9), and testosterone levels 370 ng/dL (570). Organic causes of CPP were excluded. No MKRN3 or DLK1 mutations were identified. Familial segregation analysis was performed when appropriate. We identified a hemizygous MECP2 variant in a boy (Patient 1) who presented at age 2.7 yr with sporadic CPP. In addition, he had speech delay and behavioral changes, defined as autism spectrum disorder by neuropsychological assessment. He harbored an extremely rare (gnomAD AF=0.000004956) missense variant (p.Val312Ile) in exon 3 of MECP2, encoding the transcriptional repression domain, critical for protein function. The p.Val312Ile mutation was classified as likely pathogenic (ACMG criteria) with a potential association with the phenotype. Another hemizygous MECP2 variant was identified in a boy (Patient 2) who presented at age 8.0 yr with sporadic CPP; he had no neurodevelopmental conditions. He harbored a rare (gnomAD AF=0.00008) missense variant (p.Arg366Cys) in exon 3, encoding the C-terminal domain, classified as a variant of uncertain significance (ACMG criteria). Familial segregation analysis revealed that both boys inherited the MECP2 variants from their unaffected mothers, consistent with a pattern of clinical variability described in women with defects in X-linked genes.Conclusions: We identified rare MECP2 variants in two boys with sporadic CPP without classic features of Rett syndrome, expanding the phenotype of patients with MECP2 mutations, as described in girls. The MECP2 p.Val312Ile variant was likely pathogenic, whereas the functional significance of the p.Arg366Cys variant in still indeterminate. These findings provide additional evidence for a role of MECP2, an epigenetic factor, in the hypothalamic control of pubertal timing. Presentation: 6/1/2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.250

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207