MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403151192 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvae163.1175

6907 Continued Improvements in Hypertension and Diabetes During Long-Term Osilodrostat Therapy in Patients with Cushing’s Disease: A Pooled Analysis from the Phase III LINC 3 and LINC 4 Studies

2024· article· en· W4403151192 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Fleseriu, Rosario Pivonello, John Newell‐Price, Mônica R. Gadelha, Richard J. Auchus, Richard A. Feelders, André Lacroix, Akira Shimatsu, Przemysław Witek, M Bex, Andrea Piacentini, Alberto M Pedroncelli, Beverly M. K. Biller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)DiseaseCushing's diseaseDiabetes mellitusMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyPhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: M. Fleseriu: Advisory Board Member; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases. Consulting Fee; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases, Sparrow, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge). Grant Recipient; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases, Sparrow, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge). R. Pivonello: Consulting Fee; Self; Corcept Therapeutics, Recordati AG, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, H Lundbeck A/S. Grant Recipient; Self; Recordati AG, Corcept Therapeutics, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge), Neurocrine Biosciences. J. Newell-Price: Consulting Fee; Self; Crinetics, Diurnal, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Recordati Rare Diseases. Grant Recipient; Self; Crinetics, Diurnal, HRA Pharmaceuticals, Recordati Rare Diseases. M. Gadelha: Advisory Board Member; Self; Novo Nordisk, Recordati, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals. Speaker; Self; Recordati, Ipsen, Pfizer, Inc., Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk. R.J. Auchus: Consulting Fee; Self; Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge), Spruce Biosciences, Neurocrine Biosciences, Corcept Therapeutics, Diurnal, Sparrow Pharmaceuticals, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Recordati Rare Diseases, Adrenas Therapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Quest Diagnostics, H Lundbeck A/S, Novo Nordisk, Besins Pharmaceuticals. Grant Recipient; Self; Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge), Spruce Biosciences, Neurocrine Biosciences, Corcept Therapeutics, Diurnal, Sparrow Pharmaceuticals, Crinetics Pharmaceuticals, Recordati Rare Diseases. R. Feelders: Consulting Fee; Self; Recordati. A. Lacroix: Consulting Fee; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Recordati, Pfizer, Inc.. Grant Recipient; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Recordati, Pfizer, Inc. A. Shimatsu: Advisory Board Member; Self; Recordati. Consulting Fee; Self; Recordati. Speaker; Self; Recordati. P. Witek: Speaker; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Recordati, Novo Nordisk, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge), Lilly USA, LLC. Other; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Ipsen, Recordati, Novo Nordisk, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge), Lilly USA, LLC. M. Bex: Consulting Fee; Self; Recordati. A. Piacentini: Employee; Self; Recordati. A.M. Pedroncelli: Employee; Self; Recordati, Camurus. B.M. Biller: Advisory Board Member; Self; Recordati Rare Diseases. Consulting Fee; Self; H Lundbeck A/S, Recordati Rare Diseases, Sparrow, Xeris Pharmaceuticals (Strongbridge). Introduction: Alleviating the burden of comorbidities such as hypertension (HTN) and diabetes mellitus (DM), through control of hypercortisolism, is an important treatment goal in the management of Cushing’s syndrome. Osilodrostat, a potent oral 11β-hydroxylase inhibitor, provided rapid, sustained cortisol normalization in Cushing’s disease (CD) patients (pts) in two Phase III studies (LINC 3, NCT02180217; LINC 4, NCT02697734), with improvements in clinical manifestations of hypercortisolism. Here, we report on the long-term changes in blood pressure (BP) and markers of glucose homeostasis in a large, pooled pt population from both trials at weeks (W) 48 and 72. Methods: LINC 3 comprised a 48W core phase, including an 8W randomized withdrawal phase for eligible pts. LINC 4 included an upfront 12W, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled period and 36W of open-label osilodrostat. Both studies had an optional extension. Baseline (BL) HTN was defined as prior diagnosis, taking antihypertensive medication, and/or systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) >130/>90 mmHg. BL DM was defined as prior diagnosis, taking antidiabetic medication, HbA1c ≥6.5%, and/or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥126 mg/dL. Data from LINC 3 and LINC 4 were pooled in a secondary exploratory analysis for all pts with data at BL and the given visit, excluding periods where pts were randomized to placebo. No formal statistical hypothesis testing was performed; all analyses are descriptive. Results: In pts with BL HTN (n=174/210; 82.9%), mean (95% CI) change in SBP/DBP was -13.9 (-18.5, -9.4)/-9.1 (-12.4, -5.8) mmHg at W48 and -14.7 (-20.1, -9.4)/-9.4 (-13.0, -5.7) mmHg at W72 for those not receiving antihypertensive medication during the study, and -8.4 (-11.9, -4.9)/-5.3 (-7.5, -3.1) mmHg at W48 and -10.1 (-14.3, -5.8)/-5.7 (-8.1, -3.2) mmHg at W72 for those who received antihypertensives. Of pts with BL SBP >130 mmHg (n=110), 50.0% had SBP ≤130 mmHg at W48 and 49.1% at W72. Of pts with BL DBP >90 mmHg (n=65), 64.6% had DBP ≤90 mmHg at W48 and 58.5% at W72. The proportion of pts taking antihypertensive medication declined from 54.3% at BL to 47.3% at W72. Mean (95% CI) change in potassium levels was -0.1 (-0.1, 0.0) mmol/L at W48 and 0.0 (-0.1, 0.1) mmol/L at W72 in pts with BL HTN, and -0.1 (-0.3, 0.1) mmol/L at both W48 and W72 in pts without BL HTN. 40.0% (n=84/210) of pts had BL DM. Of pts with BL FPG ≥100 mg/dL (n=60), 43.3% and 33.3% had FPG <100 mg/dL at W48 and W72, respectively. The proportion of pts taking antidiabetic medication declined from 21.9% at BL to 17.1% at W72. Conclusions: Many pts with CD and HTN or DM showed improvements during osilodrostat therapy, which were maintained or further improved with long-term therapy. Cortisol normalization is associated with improvements in hypercortisolism-associated comorbidities in pts with CD. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Endocrine SocietySame topicPituitary Gland Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207