MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403153226 · doi:10.1210/jendso/bvae163.528

12605 Two Systematic Reviews Of Treatment Efficacy On Patient Important Outcomes In Children X-linked Hypophosphatemia

2024· article· en· W4403153226 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Endocrine Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBiomedical Research and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of OttawaWestern UniversityMcMaster UniversityUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypophosphatemiaMedicineIntensive care medicineSystematic reviewPediatricsMEDLINEInternal medicinePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disclosure: D.S. Ali: None. R. Mirza: None. S. Hussein: None. F. Alsarraf: None. R. Alexander: Consulting Fee; Self; Ultragenyx. Grant Recipient; Self; Ardylex Inc.. H. AbuAlrob: None. M. Brandi: Consulting Fee; Self; Aboca, Alexion, Amolyt, Bruno Farmaceutici, Calcilytix, Echolight, Kyowa Kirin, Personal Genomics,. Speaker; Self; Kyowa Kirin, Abiogen, Alexion, Amgen, Amolyt, Amorphical, Bruno Farmaceutici, Eli Lilly & Company. T.O. Carpenter: Advisory Board Member; Self; Kyowa Kirin, Ultragenyx. Consulting Fee; Self; Kyowa Kirin, Ultragenyx. Grant Recipient; Self; Ultragenyx. Other; Self; Assoc. Editor JBMR, President Ped Endo Soc, Author UpToDate (royalties), XLH-Network (Patient Advisory Org). K. Dandurand: Speaker; Self; Amgen Inc, Kyowa Kirin. G. Filler: Consulting Fee; Self; Kyowa Kirin, Ultragenyx, ProKidney. Speaker; Self; Ultragenyx, ProKidney. P.F. Florenzano: ; Institutional Research Grants: Ultragenyx. ; Advisory Boards: Ultragenyx, Kyowa Kirin. S. Fukumoto: Consulting Fee; Self; Kyowa Kirin. C. Grasemann: Speaker; Self; Kyowa Kirin. E.A. Imel: ; Ultragenyx (Research funding and consulting). ; Kyowa Kirin (research funding and consulting). ; Inozyme (consulting). ; Amgen (research funding). S.M. Jan De Beur: Consulting Fee; Self; Ultragenyx, Kyowa Kirin. Research Investigator; Self; Ultragenyx. E. Morgante: None. L.M. Ward: ; clinical trials with Ultragenyx. ; consultancy to Kyowa Kirin and Ultragenyx. ; unrestricted educational grants from Ultragenyx and Kyowa Kirin (with funds to Dr. Ward’s instituition). A.A. Khan: Advisory Board Member; Self; Amgen Inc, Ascendis, Alexion. Grant Recipient; Self; Takeda, Amolyt, Calcilytix. Speaker; Self; Amgen Inc, Ascendis, Alexion. G. Guyatt: None. Objective: We sought to examine the highest certainty evidence on managing X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) in children, aiming to inform treatment recommendations of XLH international guidelines. Data Sources: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from inception to March 2023. We also reviewed reference lists of eligible studies and pertinent review articles. Study eligibility criteria: Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies enrolling individuals younger than 18 years old with XLH diagnosed on clinical grounds or with a confirmed pathogenic variant in PHEX. Articles were selected according to specific criteria evaluating the effectiveness of burosumab compared to either no treatment or conventional therapy (phosphate salts and active vitamin D) or evaluating conventional therapy compared to no treatment. Methods: Two reviewers independently determined eligibility, conducted data extraction, and assessed the risk of bias (RoB) in eligible articles. We employed the GRADE methodology to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. Results: After removing duplicates from 7,043 citations, we screened 4,114 records and assessed 254 full texts, of which in the systematic review (SR) addressing burosumab one RCT and one post-Hoc study proved eligible. Being open-label design, the RoB was high, with certainty of evidence on individual outcomes ranging from moderate to very low. Burosumab, compared to conventional therapy, probably prevents lower limb deformity, and improves physical health quality of life (QoL) (moderate certainty). It might also increase height and possibly improve the burden of symptoms related to chronic hypophosphatemia (low certainty). Conversely, burosumab probably increases Treatment-Emergent adverse events after the first administration (moderate certainty), and it may increase dental abscesses (low certainty). In the second SR, one observational study assessing conventional therapy versus no treatment was at high RoB providing very low certainty of evidence regarding the impact of conventional therapy compared to no treatment on final height. Conclusion: Our review indicates that burosumab likely offers benefits in preventing lower limb deformity and improving physical health QoL, while potentially increasing height and improving the burden of symptoms related to chronic hypophosphatemia (low certainty). However, it may also increase adverse events, including dental abscesses. Additionally, our review found limited evidence regarding the impact of conventional therapy compared to no treatment on final height in children. These findings highlight the need for further research to better understand the long-term impact of conventional therapy and burosumab in children. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it