MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403153588 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348103

1-arcsecond imaging of the ELAIS-N1 field at 144MHz using the LoTSS survey with the international LOFAR telescope

2024· article· en· W4403153588 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Haoyang Ye, Frits Sweijen, R. J. van Weeren, W. L. Williams, J. K. de Jong, L. K. Morabito, H. J. A. Röttgering, T. W. Shimwell, P. N. Best, M. Bondi, M. Brüggen, F. de Gasperin, Cyril Tasse

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstronomy and Astrophysical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilMedical Research CouncilInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsLOFARPhysicsAstrophysicsTelescopeAstronomyRadio telescope

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the first wide area (2.5 × 2.5 deg 2 ) LOFAR high band antenna image at a resolution of 1.2″ × 2″ with a median noise of ≈80 µJy beam −1 . It was made from an 8-hour International LOFAR Telescope (ILT) observation of the ELAIS-N1 field at frequencies ranging from 120 to 168 MHz with the most up-to-date ILT imaging methods. This intermediate resolution falls between the highest possible resolution (0.3″) achievable by using all ILT baselines and the standard 6-arcsec resolution in the LOFAR Two-meter Sky Survey (LoTSS) image products utilising the LOFAR Dutch baselines only. This is the first demonstration of the feasibility of imaging using the ILT at a resolution of ~1″, which provides unique information on source morphology at scales that fall below the surface brightness limits at higher resolutions. The total calibration and imaging computational time is approximately 52 000 core hours, which is nearly five times more than required to produce a 6″ resolution image. We also present a radio source catalogue containing 2263 sources detected over the 2.5 × 2.5 deg 2 image of the ELAIS-N1 field, with a peak intensity threshold of 5.5 σ . The catalogue has been cross-matched with the LoTSS deep ELAIS-N1 field radio catalogue, and its flux density and positional accuracy have been investigated and corrected accordingly. We find that ~80% of sources that we expect to be detectable based on their peak brightness in the LoTSS 6″ resolution image are detected in this image, which is approximately a factor of two higher than for 0.3″ resolution imaging in the Lockman Hole, implying there is a wealth of information on these intermediate scales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score0.595

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchFrench-language works237,207