Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explores the ways of creating a trust, according to Article 2074 of the Civil Code of the Republic of Moldova. To shed light on the legislative inspiration and the distinct characteristics of various methods of establishment, a comparative analysis is conducted concerning the provisions outlined in Book X (Trusts) of the Draft Common Frame of Reference, as well as the Civil Codes of the Province of Quebec, France, Romania, and the Republic of Moldova. The discussion emphasizes the ways for voluntarily creating a trust, namely by contract, unilateral declaration, and will, all of which are comprehensively regulated. Additionally, the article addresses the mechanism of creating a trust through administrative act or court decision, situations that necessitate explicit legislative regulation before implementation. The paper also delves into the relationship between ‘law’ and ‘administrative act’ as sources of trusts, presenting a hypothesis that the legislator intentionally substituted this term in the legislation of the Republic of Moldova.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.030 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.079 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.023 | 0.028 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.021 |
| Research integrity | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".