MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exposure levels and target attainment of meropenem in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a prospective observational study

2024· preprint· en· W4403155561 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ibrahim El‐Haffaf, Amélie Marsot, Alice Paillault, Viviane Giang, Virginie Williams, Marc-André Smith, Martin Albert, Michaël Chassé, David Williamson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalUniversité de Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéServierUniversité de Montréal
KeywordsObservational studyIntensive care unitMeropenemMedicineIntensive care medicineEmergency medicineIntensive careInternal medicineAntibioticsBiologyMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aim: Patients hospitalized in the intensive care units (ICU) with serious infections require rapid and optimal broad-spectrum antibiotic regimens to ensure favorable outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the exposure and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment of meropenem in critically ill patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study in two Canadian intensive care units (ICU) from January 2021 to December 2023. We included adult patients admitted in the ICU who received meropenem. On study day 1, 4 and 7 of antimicrobial therapy, three blood samples were collected: 1 h after meropenem dose administration, at the middle and at the end of the dosing interval. Samples were analyzed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detector. The pharmacokinetic profile of meropenem was evaluated, as well as the attainment of plasma concentrations above minimum inhibitory concentrations of 2, 4 and 8 mg/L at mid-point and at trough. Results: We enrolled twenty-eight patients and analyzed 167 meropenem concentrations. We observed large interindividual variability, with up to a 58-fold difference, but intra-patient variability was low. At mid-point, 52% of concentrations were below the target concentration of 8 mg/L, while this proportion increased to 73% for trough concentrations. Patients who failed to reach therapeutic concentrations all had normal to augmented renal clearance. Conclusion: The majority of ICU patients who received meropenem were underexposed for a target concentration of 8 mg/L, with significant interindividual variability. A more personalized approach such as TDM may help achieve optimal target concentration and potentially improve clinical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyFrench-language works237,207