MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403158977 · doi:10.1016/j.heha.2024.100113

Assessing the multi-dimensional effects of air pollution on maternal complications and birth outcomes: A structural equation modeling approach

2024· article· en· W4403158977 on OpenAlexaff
Boubakari Ibrahimou, Ning Sun, Sophie Dabo‐Niang

Bibliographic record

VenueHygiene and Environmental Health Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNHLBI Division of Intramural ResearchNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsStructural equation modelingAir pollutionEconometricsEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental healthMedicineStatisticsMathematicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: This cross-sectional study aims to investigate the direct and indirect relationships between exposure to a metal mixture in air and adverse pregnancy outcomes across gestational stages. Methods: and unravel their effects on pregnancy complications (preeclampsia and gestational diabetes) and birth outcomes (low birth weight and preterm birth risks). Results: A latent variable featuring seven metals (Aluminum, Calcium, Iron, Magnesium, Manganese, Silicon, Vanadium) was identified through the measurement model. The latent metal mixture exposure had direct effects on gestational diabetes and preterm birth (1st trimester, 2nd trimester), low birth weight (1st trimester), and preeclampsia (2nd trimester). When considering total effects, the effects on low birth weight in the 1st trimester and on preeclampsia in 2nd trimester were masked, and the latent metal mixture increased the low-birth-weight risk in 2nd trimester by 2 % (OR = 1.02, 95 % CI = [1.00, 1.03]). Conclusion: , and provides additional evidence for understanding the pathway of the pollution effects on fetal health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.090

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.004
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHygiene and Environmental Health AdvancesSame topicHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityFrench-language works237,207