On the Various Energy Forms of the Join of Complete Graphs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The concept of graph energy, first introduced in 1978, has been a focal point of extensive research within the field of graph theory, leading to the publication of numerous articles. Graph energy, originally associated with the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrix of a graph, has since been extended to various other matrices. These include the maximum degree matrix, Randić matrix, sum-connectivity matrix, and the first and second Zagreb matrices, among others. In this paper, we focus on calculating the energy of several such matrices for the join graph of complete graphs, denoted as J m ( K n ) . Specifically, we compute the energies for the maximum degree matrix, Randić matrix, sum-connectivity matrix, first Zagreb matrix, second Zagreb matrix, reverse first Zagreb matrix, and reverse second Zagreb matrix for J m ( K n ) . Our results provide new insights into the structural properties of the join graph and contribute to the broader understanding of the mathematical characteristics of graph energy for different matrix representations. This work extends the scope of graph energy research by considering these alternative matrix forms, offering a deeper exploration into the algebraic and spectral properties of graph energy in the context of join graphs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".