OrgXenomics: an integrated proteomic knowledge base for patient-derived organoid and xenograft
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patient-derived models (PDMs, particularly organoids and xenografts) are irreplaceable tools for precision medicine, from target development to lead identification, then to preclinical evaluation, and finally to clinical decision-making. So far, PDM-based proteomics has emerged to be one of the cutting-edge directions and massive data have been accumulated. However, such PDM-based proteomic data have not been provided by any of the available databases, and proteomics profiles of all proteins in proteomic study are also completely absent from existing databases. Herein, an integrated database named 'OrgXenomics' was thus developed to provide the proteomic data for PDMs, which was unique in (a) explicitly describing the establishment detail for a wide array of models, (b) systematically providing the proteomic profiles (expression/function/interaction) for all proteins in studied proteomic analysis and (c) comprehensively giving the raw data for diverse organoid/xenograft-based proteomic studies of various diseases. Our OrgXenomics was expected to server as one good complement to existing proteomic databases, and had great implication for the practice of precision medicine, which could be accessed at: https://idrblab.org/orgxenomics/.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".