MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Enhancing Video Streaming Performance Using Network Digital Twins: Buffer Control and Video Caching Strategies

2024· preprint· en· W4403180126 on OpenAlexaff
Todd Mostak, Chris Obiodu, Stephen Jimmy, Kalkidan Berhane

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDigital videoComputer networkBuffer (optical fiber)Video streamingControl (management)Real-time computingVideo on demandTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the growing demand for high-definition video streaming services, optimizing network performance is increasingly important. Network Digital Twins (NDTs) offer real-time virtual replicas of physical networks, enabling simulation, prediction, and optimization of network behaviors. This paper proposes a framework that integrates NDTs with buffer control and video caching strategies to enhance video streaming performance. The framework dynamically adjusts buffer sizes and caching policies based on network predictions from the NDT. Simulation results demonstrate that our approach reduces average latency by 25% and buffer underruns by 40% compared to traditional methods. The study highlights the potential of NDTs in improving network management and video streaming services.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0060.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207