MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403181869 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3475732

Deep Learning-Based Interference Detection, Classification, and Forecasting Algorithm for ESM Radar Systems

2024· article· en· W4403181869 on OpenAlexaff
Hamda Bouzabia, Georges Kaddoum, Tri Nhu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced SAR Imaging Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRadarInterference (communication)Artificial intelligenceStatistical classificationMachine learningAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, aiming to address the challenges posed by interference from communication systems and jammers, we investigate the application of deep learning (DL) in electronic support measures (ESM) radar systems. Our primary objective is to detect, classify, and forecast interference that can disrupt detection of low probability of intercept (LPI) and low probability of detection (LPD) signals. The proposed algorithm uses a time-frequency distribution (TFD) and received interference strength (RIS) to detect and predict interference. To ensure high precision,we develop a new DL-based outlier detection (OD) technique that is based on the relationship between true positive rate (TPR) and latent space. More specifically, the OD technique applies a new dual-threshold mechanism to the TFD representation for interference detection. We also introduce a DL-enabled classifier designed using the OD architecture to identify the source of interference. Finally, we forecast the RIS by proposing a new DL autoregressive (AR) model through a sliding window designed using the classifier’s output. By integrating OD in classifier design and using its output for forecasting, our approach achieves superior accuracy as compared to independent models. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm outperforms others, particularly in low signal-to-interference plus noise ratio (SINR) conditions. Specifically, in terms of interference detection, our algorithm achieves 0.9978 TPR, 0.9415 recall, and 0.0004 false positive ratio (FPR). With regard to classification, it records 0.9784 precision and 0.7847 recall. In forecasting, it achieves a 0.2100 mean average error (MAE), thus significantly enhancing ESM radar awareness. The TFD feature also proves to be more accurate than in-phase and quadrature features. These strengths, coupled with an optimal balance of cost and accuracy, make our framework robust and resistant to interference.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAdvanced SAR Imaging TechniquesFrench-language works237,207