Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Get Active Questionnaire for Pregnancy (GAQ-P) to Spanish population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Physical activity during pregnancy reduces the risk of developing pregnancy complications. Despite the strong recommendations for physical activity during pregnancy, the compliance is suboptimal. The Get Active Questionnaire for Pregnancy (GAQ-P) , developed by CESP provides a screening tool for physical activity contraindications and promotes physical activity during pregnancy. The aim of this study is to translate, and perform a cross-cultural adaptation of the GAQ-P to be used in Spanish population. A multidisciplinary expert group was set-up for the validation process including experts in obstetrics and gynecology, sports medicine, physical activity and sports, and midwives. The translation and cultural adaptation of the GAQ-P and associated Health Care Provider Consultation Form followed the International Society for Pharmaecoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines. The validated Spanish version of the GAQ-P, and the Health Care Provider Consultation Form for Prenatal Physical Activity was achieved. During the cognitive debriefing, we included 73 stakeholders (pregnant women, healthcare professionals and physical activity and sports professionals) from different regions of Spain, to improve the cultural aspects and the comprehensibility of the translation. Following the validation process, we have obtained a reliable evidence-based screening tool to be used in Spanish, aiming to reduce the barriers for most women to be physically active during pregnancy, and assisting healthcare providers and physical activity professionals in the identification of women that have contraindications for physical activity during pregnancy. - The Spanish version of the Get Active Questionnaire for Pregnancy (GAQ-P), provides a tool for physical activity contraindications and promotes physical activity during pregnancy. - The translation and cultural adaptation of the GAQ-P in Spanish is essential for the dissemination of this valuable tool, breaking barriers for physical activity during pregnancy and improving the adherence to the actual recommendations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".