Conditional probabilistic diffusion model driven synthetic radiogenomic applications in breast cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study addresses the heterogeneity of Breast Cancer (BC) by employing a Conditional Probabilistic Diffusion Model (CPDM) to synthesize Magnetic Resonance Images (MRIs) based on multi-omic data, including gene expression, copy number variation, and DNA methylation. The lack of paired medical images and genomics data in previous studies presented a challenge, which the CPDM aims to overcome. The well-trained CPDM successfully generated synthetic MRIs for 726 TCGA-BRCA patients, who lacked actual MRIs, using their multi-omic profiles. Evaluation metrics such as Frechet's Inception Distance (FID), Mean Square Error (MSE), and Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) demonstrated the CPDM's effectiveness, with an FID of 2.02, an MSE of 0.02, and an SSIM of 0.59 based on the 15-fold cross-validation. The synthetic MRIs were used to predict clinical attributes, achieving an Area Under the Receiver-Operating-Characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.82 and an Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) of 0.84 for predicting ER+/HER2+ subtypes. Additionally, the MRIs served to accurately predicted BC patient survival with a Concordance-index (C-index) score of 0.88, outperforming other baseline models. This research demonstrates the potential of CPDMs in generating MRIs based on BC patients' genomic profiles, offering valuable insights for radiogenomic research and advancements in precision medicine. The study provides a novel approach to understanding BC heterogeneity for early detection and personalized treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".