Intramolecular Vibrational Energy Redistribution in the Reaction H<sub>3</sub><sup>+</sup> + CO → H<sub>2</sub> + HCO<sup>+</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An ab initio direct molecular dynamics (MD) calculation at the RS2/aug-cc-pVQZ level, followed by vibration mapping, has been applied to the H 3 + + CO → H 2 + HCO + reaction to elucidate the intramolecular vibrational energy redistribution (IVR) processes during the reaction. Direct MD calculations were carried out for 20 K (a typical temperature for interstellar dark clouds) and 330 K (a typical translational temperature for ions in a glow discharge). Under the C s symmetry constraint, the approach of H 3 + turned out to be the H–C stretching mode of the [H···CO] + part, which invoked the C–O stretching and then the H–C–O bending modes. Under no symmetry constraint, a strong bending mode was first invoked, and the intensities of the subsequent H–C and C–O stretching modes were kept relatively small. The detailed analyses of the IVR during the reaction, in terms of vibration mixing, gave a clue to understanding experimentally observed anomalies in the bending modes, such as population inversion at some bending states. In the MD simulation at 20 K, less than two-thirds of the reaction energy was converted to the vibrational energy of the resultant HCO + part and one-third to the translational and rotational energies of the leaving H 2 molecule. These direct MD simulations, when combined with the experimental spectroscopy data, shed light on a clear understanding of the reaction mechanism, including the IVR during the reaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".