Percidae Version 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arratia, G., R.A. Scasso & W. Kiessling. 2004. Late Jurassic fishes from Longing Gap, Antarctic Peninsula. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 24(1):41–55. https://doi.org/10.1671/1952-4 Betancur-R. R., R. Broughton, E. Wiley, K. Carpenter, J. López, C. Li, N. Holcroft, D. Arcila, M. Sanciangco, J. Cureton II, F. Zhang, T. Buser, M. Campbell, J. Ballesteros, A. Roa-Varon, S. Willis, W. Borden, T. Rowley, P. Reneau, D. Hough, G. Lu, T. Grande, G. Arratia & G. Ortí. 2013. The Tree of Life and a New Classification of Bony Fishes. PLOS Currents: Tree of Life. http://currents.plos.org/treeoflife/article/the-tree-of-life-and-a-new-classification-of-bony-fishes/ (Accessed 1/5/17). http://doi.org/10.1371/currents.tol.53ba26640df0ccaee75bb165c8c26288 Boschung, H.T. & R.L. Mayden. 2004. Fishes of Alabama. Smithsonian Books, Washington, D.C. 960 pages. Cavender, T.M. 1998. Development of the North American Tertiary freshwater fish fauna with a look at parallel trends found in the European record. Italian Journal of Zoology 65(S1):149–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250009809386807 Collette, B.B. & P. Bănărescu. 1977. Systematics and zoogeography of the fishes of the family Percidae. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 34(10):1450–1463. https://doi.org/10.1139/f77-209 Dickinson, W.C. 1986. Identification and analysis of ichthyofaunal remains from late Pleistocene-Holocene deposits of Cheek Bend Cave (40MU261), Maury County, Tennessee. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tennessee–Knoxville. 209 pages. Goodrich, E.S. 1930. Studies on the structure & development of vertebrates. Macmillan, London. 837 pages. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.82144 Greenwood, P.H., D.E. Rosen, S.H. Weitzman & G.S. Myers. 1966. Phyletic studies of teleostean fishes, with a provisional classification of living forms. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 131(4):341–455. Griffith, E. & C.H. Smith. 1834. The class Pisces, arranged by the Baron Cuvier, with supplementary additions, by Edward Griffith, F.R.S. &c. and Lieut.-Col. Charles Hamilton Smith, F.R., L.S.S. &c. &c. In: Cuvier, G: The animal kingdom, arranged in conformity with its organization, by the Baron Cuvier, member of the Institute of France &c. &c. &c., with supplementary additions to each order, by Edward Griffith ... and others. (2nd ed.) Whittaker & Co., London. 680 pages. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.45021 Haponski, A.E. & C.A. Stepien. 2013. Phylogenetic and biogeographical relationships of the Sander pikeperches (Percidae: Perciformes): patterns across North America and Eurasia. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 110(1):156–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12114 Huxley, T.H. 1880. On the application of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the Vertebrata, and more particularly of the Mammalia. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1880:649–662. Jacquemin, S.J., J.A. Ebersole, W.C. Dickinson & C.N. Ciampaglio. 2016. Late Pleistocene fishes of the Tennessee River Basin: an analysis of a late Pleistocene freshwater fish fauna from Bell Cave (site ACb-2) in Colbert County, Alabama, USA. PeerJ 4:e1648. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1648 Mitchill, S.L. 1818. Memoir on ichthyology. The fishes of New York, described and arranged. In a supplement to the Memoir... American Monthly Magazine and Critical Review 2(4–1):241–248. Müller, J. 1845. Über den Bau und die Grenzen der Ganoiden, und über das natürliche System der Fische. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 11(1):91–141. Near, T.J., C.M. Bossu, G.S. Bradburd, R.L. Carlson, R.C. Harrington, P.R. Hollingsworth, Jr., B.P. Keck & D.A. Etnier. 2011. Phylogeny and temporal diversification of darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). Systematic Biology 60(5):565–595. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syr052 Nelson, J.S., T.C. Grande & M.V.H. Wilson. 2016. Fishes of the World, 5th edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. 707 pages. Oken, L. 1817. V. Kl. Fische. Isis (Oken) 1(8)(148):1779–1782 Page, L.M. & B.M. Burr. 2011. Peterson Field Guide to Freshwater Fishes, second edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York. 688 pages. Patterson, C. & D.E Rosen. 1977. Review of the ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 158:83–172. Pinna, M.C.C. de. 1996. Teleostean monophyly. Pages 147–162. In: M.L.J. Stiassny, L.R. Parenti & G.D. Johnson (editors). Interrelationships of Fishes. Academic Press, San Diego. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012670950-6/50008-4 Rafinesque, C.S. 1815. Analyse de la nature, ou tableau de l’univers et des corps organizes. Per le stampe di Sanfilippo, Palermo. 224 pages. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.106607 Regan, C.T. 1923. The skeleton of Lepidosteus, with remarks on the origin and evolution of the lower neopterygian fishes. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1923(1–2):445–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1923.tb02191.x Rosen, D.E. 1985. An essay on euteleostean classification. American Museum Novitates 2827: 1–57. Smith, G.R. 1981. Late Cenozoic freshwater fishes of North America. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12:163–193. Stepien, C.A. & A.E. Haponski. 2015. Taxonomy, distribution, and evolution of the Percidae. Pages 3–60. In: P. Kestemont, K. Dabrowski & R.C. Summerfelt (editors). Biology and Culture of Percid Fishes: Principles and Practices. Springer, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7227-3_1 Wainwright, P.C., W.L. Smith, S.A. Price, K.L. Tang, J.S. Sparks, L.A. Ferry, K.L. Kuhn, R.I. Eytan & T.J. Near. 2012. The evolution of pharyngognathy: a phylogenetic and functional appraisal of the pharyngeal jaw key innovation in labroid fishes and beyond. Systematic Biology 61(6):1001–1027. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys060 Walker, R.B. 1998. Late Paleoindian through Middle Archaic faunal evidence from Dust Cave, Alabama. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee–Knoxville. 302 pages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.422 | 0.386 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".