NeRSI: Neural implicit representations for 5D seismic data interpolation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Due to challenging field operations and resource constraints, seismic data acquisition often requires coping with missing traces. Interpolation algorithms are crucial for reconstructing these missing traces to enable improved subsurface analysis and interpretation. Although deep learning has made exciting advances in seismic reconstruction, its focus has predominantly been on 2D and 3D data sets with relatively low rates of missing data. Reconstruction of 5D seismic data entails considering simultaneous sources and receivers deployed in areal arrays to solve the reconstruction problem. The latter offers greater data redundancy, which can be leveraged to enhance interpolation quality. Traditional 5D deep-learning interpolation methods rely heavily on synthetic training pairs, posing challenges when applied to real-world data. This necessitates transfer learning techniques, which can be cumbersome. To address this, we introduce a self-supervised, coordinate-based deep interpolation algorithm that mitigates the need for labeled data. Using a multilayer perceptron (MLP) network can effectively encode the continuous seismic 5D wavefield. Once trained, the MLP can infer missing trace amplitudes from their coordinates. We contribute to boosting the MLP, enabling it to generate seismic profiles rather than single-point predictions. This enhancement significantly strengthens the model’s performance and efficiency. Moreover, we apply nuclear norm regularization to the output profiles, improving the reconstruction quality. The effectiveness of our algorithm is illustrated with synthetic and field data experiments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".