MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403192323 · doi:10.3390/en17194990

On the Use of the Multi-Site Langmuir Model for Predicting Methane Adsorption on Shale

2024· article· en· W4403192323 on OpenAlexaff
Zhe Wu, Yuan Ji, Ke Zhang, Jing Li, Tianyi Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil shaleMethaneAdsorptionLangmuirLangmuir adsorption modelShale gasEnvironmental sciencePetroleum engineeringChemical engineeringChemistryGeologyWaste managementEngineeringPhysical chemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shale gas, mainly consisting of adsorbed gas and free gas, has served a critical role of supplying the growing global natural gas demand in the past decades. Considering that the adsorbed methane has contributed up to 80% of the total gas in place (GIP), understanding the methane adsorption behaviors is imperative to an accurate estimation of total GIP. Historically, the single-site Langmuir model, with the assumption of a homogeneous surface, is commonly applied to estimate the adsorbed gas amount. However, this assumption cannot depict the methane adsorption characteristics due to various compositions and pore sizes of shales. In this work, a multi-site model integrating the energetic heterogeneity in adsorption is derived to predict methane adsorption on shale. Our results show that the multi-site model is capable of addressing the heterogeneity of shales by a wide range of adsorption energy distributions (owing to the complex compositions and different pore sizes), which is different from the single-site model only characterized by single adsorption energy. Consequently, the multi-site model results have better accuracy against the experimental data. Therefore, applying the multi-site Langmuir model for estimating GIP in shales can achieve more accurate results compared with using the traditionally single-site model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergiesSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207