On the Use of the Multi-Site Langmuir Model for Predicting Methane Adsorption on Shale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shale gas, mainly consisting of adsorbed gas and free gas, has served a critical role of supplying the growing global natural gas demand in the past decades. Considering that the adsorbed methane has contributed up to 80% of the total gas in place (GIP), understanding the methane adsorption behaviors is imperative to an accurate estimation of total GIP. Historically, the single-site Langmuir model, with the assumption of a homogeneous surface, is commonly applied to estimate the adsorbed gas amount. However, this assumption cannot depict the methane adsorption characteristics due to various compositions and pore sizes of shales. In this work, a multi-site model integrating the energetic heterogeneity in adsorption is derived to predict methane adsorption on shale. Our results show that the multi-site model is capable of addressing the heterogeneity of shales by a wide range of adsorption energy distributions (owing to the complex compositions and different pore sizes), which is different from the single-site model only characterized by single adsorption energy. Consequently, the multi-site model results have better accuracy against the experimental data. Therefore, applying the multi-site Langmuir model for estimating GIP in shales can achieve more accurate results compared with using the traditionally single-site model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".