MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403192750 · doi:10.20868/abe.2024.2.5272

AN OVERVIEW OF INVESTIGATING THE NEW STRUCTURAL SYSTEAM(LSF) = UNA RESUMEN DE LA INVESTIGACIÓN DEL NUEVO SISTEMA ESTRUCTURAL (LSF)

2024· article· es· W4403192750 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amirhossein Javaherikhah, Samane Khezli, Mercedes Valiente-López

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Building Education · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La construcción de estructuras ligeras de acero (LSF) es uno de los métodos constructivos más eficientes actualmente en uso. Debido a la rápida velocidad de este sistema, la calidad superior de la construcción y la adecuada resistencia a los terremotos desde la década de 1950, ahora incluye países como Japón, Estados Unidos y Canadá. Las secciones de acero con paredes delgadas son el componente principal de las estructuras de acero ligeras (LSF). Debido a las características de los perfiles utilizados en este sistema, como la laminación en frío del acero y la ausencia de tensiones residuales en los perfiles, la capacidad de crear perfiles con diversas formas y con alta resistencia y dureza, y precisión y rapidez en la ejecución e instalación de la estructura en comparación con los métodos convencionales. En comparación con los edificios convencionales, la construcción se ejecutó e instaló con mayor precisión y rapidez, al menor costo posible. El empleo de este enfoque de construcción es un método industrial alternativo en proyectos de construcción, así como en viviendas masivas, para disminuir y prevenir el desperdicio de recursos y materiales típicamente presentes en las construcciones tradicionales. En general, el uso de esta estructura es apropiado en todos los sentidos y se ha logrado el objetivo de desarrollo urbano sostenible.AbstractThe construction of light steel structures (LSF) is one of the most efficient construction methods currently in use. Due to this system's fast speed, superior building quality, and adequate earthquake resilience since the 1950s, it now includes countries like Japan, America, and Canada. Steel sections with thin walls are the primary component of light steel structures (LSF). Due to the features of the sections used in this system, such as cold rolling of the steel and the absence of residual stresses in the sections. The ability to create sections with various shapes and with high resistance and hardness, and accuracy and speed in the execution and installation of the structure compared to conventional methods. Compared to typical buildings, the construction was executed and installed with greater precision and speed, at the lowest possible cost. The employment of this construction approach is an alternative industrial method in construction projects as well as mass housing to lessen and prevent the waste of resources and materials typically present in traditional building. this structure's use is appropriate in every way, and the goal of sustainable urban development has been accomplished.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in Building EducationSame topicStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207