Robust MPC design for multi-model infinite-dimensional distributed parameter systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Infinite-dimensional systems are essential for describing complex phenomena that exhibit continuous spatial and temporal variations. This article introduces a robust model predictive control (RMPC) design to regulate constrained multi-model infinite-dimensional systems governed by a class of hyperbolic/parabolic partial differential equations (PDEs). Model uncertainty stems from system parameters that are imprecisely determined, but can be quantitatively characterized within a certain range. The RMPC algorithm is designed in a discrete-time infinite-dimensional setting, achieved through the structure-preserving Cayley–Tustin transformation without model reduction nor spatial approximation. Robustness of the controller is ensured via constraining the future cost for each model dynamics accounting for uncertainty description. Properties of the closed-loop system are discussed, including feasibility, convergence, and asymptotic stability. The proposed controller is implemented by considering three typical infinite-dimensional distributed parameter process models, with simulation demonstrating the effectiveness and enhanced performance of the RMPC over the nominal model predictive controller.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it