MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403199392 · doi:10.1021/acsestair.4c00124

Ozone Uptake Kinetics and Implications for the Extent of Modification of Airborne Pollen

2024· article· en· W4403199392 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Simon, J. G. Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueACS ES&T Air · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPollenOzoneKineticsEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesEnvironmental chemistryChemistryMeteorologyGeologyGeographyBotanyPhysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ground-level ozone, a highly reactive air pollutant, is known to cause significant damage to biological surfaces. Understanding the interaction between ozone and pollen is crucial, as it may influence pollen allergenicity and reproductive viability. Measurements were conducted to determine the kinetics and extent of ozone uptake for 12 different types of tree pollen (Birch, Sycamore Maple, Box Elder Maple, Alder Gray, Cypress, Ash, Mulberry, Juniper, White Pine, Lombardy Poplar, Red Oak, and Black Oak). The results revealed an initial rapid uptake of ozone, followed by a gradual decline due to the saturation of surface reaction sites and the depletion of reactive substances. The geometric initial uptake coefficients (γ 0 -geo) ranged from 0.4 to 6.4 × 10 –5, and surface saturation was reached under our experimental conditions on a time scale of 1500–10,000 s. Using the integrated uptake of ozone over the observation period, we calculated surface site concentrations of 10 14 –10 16 sites cm –2 . Most experiments were performed under dry conditions, but tests with Birch at intermediate relative humidities, up to 60%, showed that the presence of water may decrease the uptake coefficient by a factor of 2. When Ash, Birch and Black Oak pollen grains were manually crushed to mimic subpollen particles, they were found to take up orders of magnitude more ozone for the same mass of pollen. For pollen grains washed in acetone to extract soluble molecules from the pollen coat, the cumulative ozone uptake for some pollen types was significantly reduced. This reduction was interpreted to arise as a loss of reactive surface sites and lipids with C═C bonds, which are crucial for ozone interactions. The presence of highly antioxidant molecules, like carotenoids in Ash, was confirmed spectroscopically, and linked to the extremely high cumulative uptake of ozone, suggesting a protective role for the pollen coat. A box model representing diurnally varying emissions, ozone oxidation and deposition was used to estimate the typical extent of oxidation of airborne pollen. The model indicated that surface oxidation peaked in the afternoon and evening concurrent with high ozone levels, and the percent oxidation ranged from 24% to 97% depending on the pollen species. Sensitivity analysis suggested that conclusively determining whether pollen grains are fully oxidized or unoxidized in the atmosphere is challenging. Instead, the extent of oxidation falls within a range that warrants further investigation into its impact on pollen and human exposure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.132

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS ES&T AirSame topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosolsFrench-language works237,207