MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403200500 · doi:10.1002/jpr3.12130

Myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins mimicking inflammatory bowel disease in a 13‐year‐old patient

2024· article· en· W4403200500 on OpenAlexaff
Dua Abuquteish, Rose Chami, Govind B. Chavhan, Thomas D. Walters, Iram Siddiqui

Bibliographic record

VenueJPGN Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAbdominal vascular conditions and treatments
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLamina propriaInflammatory bowel diseasePathologyMesenteric ischemiaIschemiaHistopathologyBiopsyHyperplasiaEdemaColonoscopyFibrosisDifferential diagnosisMesenteryMesenteric VeinGastroenterologyDiseaseInternal medicinePortal veinColorectal cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Idiopathic myointimal hyperplasia of the mesenteric veins (IMHMV) is a rare entity reported in adults, frequently mimicking inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We report the first case of intestinal ischemia secondary to IMHMV presenting as IBD in a pediatric patient with Down syndrome. Chronic intestinal ischemia is rare in children, and this case emphasizes the need to consider this in the differential, when histopathology is suggestive. Clinical findings and colonoscopy in these patients may mimic IBD. The mucosal biopsies do not show classic features of IBD. Instead, there can be variable extent of mucosal changes such as dilated small capillaries in the lamina propria, edema, and early fibrosis. These changes may in fact represent early chronic ischemia. These findings should alert for vascular imaging and a full-thickness biopsy to assess submucosal and subserosal larger vessels since medium- and large-caliber veins in the colonic wall and mesentery are affected in IMHMV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJPGN ReportsSame topicAbdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207