MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403203239 · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcae299

Watershed regions are more susceptible to tissue microstructural injury in multiple sclerosis

2024· article· en· W4403203239 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ahmad A. Toubasi, Junzhong Xu, Jarrod Eisma, Salma AshShareef, Caroline Gheen, Taegan Vinarsky, Pragnya Adapa, Shailee Shah, James Eaton, Richard Dortch, Manus J. Donahue, Francesca Bagnato

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Communications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Multiple Sclerosis SocietyMultiple Sclerosis SocietyHealth Services Research and DevelopmentU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsMultiple sclerosisWhite matterLesionMagnetic resonance imagingWatershedMedicinePartial volumeMyelinNuclear medicinePathologyRadiologyCentral nervous systemInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Histopathologic studies report higher concentrations of multiple sclerosis white matter lesions in watershed areas of the brain, suggesting that areas with relatively lower oxygen levels may be more vulnerable to disease. However, it is unknown at what point in the disease course lesion predilection for watershed territories begins. Accordingly, we studied a cohort of people with newly diagnosed disease and asked whether (1) white matter lesions disproportionally localize to watershed-regions and (2) the degree of microstructural injury in watershed-lesions is more severe. Fifty-four participants, i.e. 38 newly diagnosed people with multiple sclerosis, clinically isolated syndrome or radiologically isolated syndrome, and 16 age- and sex-matched healthy controls underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging. T1-weighted and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences, selective inversion recovery quantitative magnetisation transfer images, and the multi-compartment diffusion imaging with the spherical mean technique were acquired. We computed the macromolecular-to-free pool size ratio, and the apparent axonal volume fraction maps to indirectly estimate myelin and axonal integrity, respectively. We produced a flow territory atlas in each subject’s native T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images using a T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging template in the Montreal Neurological Institute 152 space. Lesion location relative to the watershed, non-watershed and mixed brain vascular territories was annotated. The same process was performed on the T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images of the healthy controls using 294 regions of interest. Generalized linear mixed models for continuous outcomes were used to assess differences in size, pool size ratio and axonal volume fraction between lesions/regions of interests (in healthy controls) situated in different vascular territories. In patients, we assessed 758 T2-lesions and 356 chronic black holes (cBHs). The watershed-territories had higher relative and absolute concentrations of T2-lesions (P≤0.041) and cBHs (P≤0.036) compared to either non-watershed- or mixed-zones. T2-lesions in watershed-areas also had lower pool size ratio relative to T2-lesions in either non-watershed- or mixed-zones (P = 0.039). These results retained significance in the sub-cohort of people without vascular comorbidities and when accounting for periventricular lesions. In healthy controls, axonal volume fraction was higher only in mixed-areas regions of interest compared to non-watershed-ones (P = 0.008). No differences in pool size ratio were seen. We provide in vivo evidence that there is an association between arterial vascularisation of the brain and multiple sclerosis-induced tissue injury as early as the time of disease diagnosis. Our findings underline the importance of oxygen delivery and healthy arterial vascularisation to prevent lesion formation and foster a better outcome in multiple sclerosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.136
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain CommunicationsSame topicMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207