MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403205961 · doi:10.32920/27190131

Using Multi-Criteria Analysis to Estimate Retail Site Attractiveness for the Huff Model

2024· preprint· en· W4403205961 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Claus Rinner, Renacin Matadeen, Stephen J. Swales

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban and Freight Transport Logistics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttractivenessSelection (genetic algorithm)Site selectionBusinessComputer scienceStatisticsGeographyMathematicsPsychologyArtificial intelligencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>The Huff model is an advanced trade area delineation technique widely used in retail site selection. It is based on site attractiveness and distance, and models probabilities of customers patronizing specific retail locations. In this research, we examine the suitability of multi-criteria analysis (MCA) to estimate the attractiveness parameter in the Huff model. In a case study of shopping centres in Toronto, we illustrate that MCA provides a suitable framework for retail site attractiveness. However, variations in the MCA technique have noticeable impacts on the Huff model results. </p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.768
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrban and Freight Transport LogisticsFrench-language works237,207