MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403210088 · doi:10.1109/tits.2024.3443832

Driver Drowsiness Detection Based on Joint Human Face and Facial Landmark Localization With Cheap Operations

2024· article· en· W4403210088 on OpenAlexaff
Qingtian Wu, Nannan Li, Liming Zhang, F. Richard Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersScience and Technology Development Fund
KeywordsLandmarkComputer visionArtificial intelligenceFace (sociological concept)Joint (building)Face detectionComputer scienceFacial recognition systemPattern recognition (psychology)Speech recognitionEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time detection of driver drowsiness is critical to reduce the risk of road accidents and fatalities. Current facial landmark-based methods usually use a two-stage paradigm, where faces and facial landmarks are localized separately. Additionally, most methods can be hindered by challenging conditions, such as night driving or eyes closed. To address these challenges, we present a refined YOLO network named YOLOFaceMark that can simultaneously detect faces and their facial landmarks. Furthermore, we introduce a drowsiness detection model based on facial landmarks. This model utilizes extracted eye and mouth information to identify drowsy states. We optimize the original YOLO components through structural re-parameterization, channel shuffling, and the design of a dual-branch detection head with an implicit module. These enhancements are designed to improve the accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency. We validate the real-time performance and accuracy of YOLOFaceMark on public datasets, including 300W and COFW. Additionally, we conduct further validation to demonstrate our ability to achieve effective and robust drowsiness detection solely based on the facial landmarks detected by YOLOFaceMark.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsSame topicSleep and Work-Related FatigueFrench-language works237,207