MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403210333 · doi:10.1109/iri62200.2024.00026

A Data Science Solution to Integrate Weather Data for Energy Consumption Analysis

2024· article· en· W4403210333 on OpenAlexaff
Thanh Huy Daniel, Carson K. Leung, Junyi Lu, Nathaniel Giesbrecht, Owen A. Hnylycia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEnergy consumptionData analysisWeather forecastingData scienceConsumption (sociology)Data modelingMeteorologyData miningDatabaseEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy efficiency and identification of consistent energy consumption patterns are crucial for reliability of a modern power grid. In this paper, we present a data science solution that integrates weather data with historical energy consumption data for energy consumption analysis. Consequently, the solution predicts temporal energy consumption patterns via techniques like frequent pattern mining, traditional machine learning, and deep learning. Our solution integrates meteorological and environmental conditions over time series, analyzes them, forecasts energy consumption, and examines how weather conditions affect energy usage variation. Evaluation results on a real-world dataset show that our solution identifies several distinct frequent patterns with frequent pattern mining, and it reveals a significant relationship between irradiance and energy consumption, as well as a positive correlation between temperature and energy usage. Moreover, our solution predicts and compares energy consumption for a specific year using linear regression, decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosting models with daily weather data. Additionally, we applied a long short-term memory (LSTM) model to analyze energy consumption as time-series data, uncovering patterns based on given time steps. These results demonstrate the practicality of our data science solution for energy consumption analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisFrench-language works237,207