Descriptor: BLDC Hall Sensor Displacement Dataset (BLDC-HSD)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Brushless dc (BLDC) motors depend on accurate rotor position detection via Hall sensors for optimal performance. Faults, such as sensor displacement, can disrupt commutation and lead to efficiency losses. Any research that utilizes deep learning to detect Hall sensor faults will benefit from using the BLDC-HSD dataset for training and testing their AI. BLDC-HSD was meticulously prepared and designed for this purpose. BLDC-HSD consists of phase current measurements under various Hall sensor displacement conditions, categorized as no delay, 0.0001 delay, 0.005 delay, and 0.01 delay. Each condition includes 60 000 data points recorded at intervals of 500 ns. Data are structured in an Excel file with columns for time and phase currents. This well-organized dataset supports the development of deep learning models for accurate fault detection and classification, contributing to enhanced motor control and diagnostic capabilities.IEEE SOCIETY/COUNCILPower Electronics Society (PELS)DATA TYPE/LOCATIONImage, Time-series; n/aDATA DOI/PID10.21227/17e3-t177
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.042 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".