Path-filtering in path-integral simulations of open quantum systems using GFlowNets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An important class of methods for modeling dynamics in open quantum systems is based on the well-known influence functional (IF) approach to solving path-integral equations of motion. Within this paradigm, path-filtering schemes based on the removal of IF elements that fall below a certain threshold aim to reduce the effort needed to calculate and store the influence functional, making very challenging simulations possible. A filtering protocol of this type is considered acceptable as long as the simulation remains mathematically stable. This, however, does not guarantee that the approximated dynamics preserve the physics of the simulated process. In this paper, we explore the possibility of training Generative Flow Networks (GFlowNets) to produce filtering protocols while optimizing for mathematical stability and for physical accuracy. Trained using the trajectory balance objective, the model produces sets of paths to be added to a truncated initial set; it is rewarded if the combined set of paths gives rise to solutions in which the trace of the density matrix is conserved, the populations remain real, and the dynamics approach the exact reference. Using a simple two-level system coupled to a dissipative reservoir, we perform proof-of-concept simulations and demonstrate the elegant and surprising filtering solutions proposed by the GFlowNet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".