MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403217155 · doi:10.1063/5.0222268

Surface plasmons on silver gratings transform pyrolytic carbon into luminescent graphitized carbon dots

2024· article· en· W4403217155 on OpenAlexafffund
Jaspreet Walia, Sabaa Rashid, Maryam Sadat Amiri Naeini, Graham Killaire, Fabio Variola, Arnaud Weck, Pierre Berini

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCarbon and Quantum Dots Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersOntario Ministry of Research and InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsPyrolytic carbonMaterials sciencePlasmonSurface plasmonLuminescencePyrolysisCarbon fibersExcited stateHighly oriented pyrolytic graphitePhotochemistryVisible spectrumRaman spectroscopyOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyChemistryScanning tunneling microscopeOpticsOrganic chemistryAtomic physicsComposite numberComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plasmonic catalysis holds the promise of opening new reaction pathways that are inaccessible thermally or via direct UV-vis electronic transitions. Here, energetic carriers produced via the decay of surface plasmons excited by visible light at 532 nm (2.33 eV, green) on a Ag-grating-bearing pyrolytic carbon residue drive its transformation into light-emitting graphitized carbon dots. The pyrolytic carbon residue is detectable via high-magnification surface-enhanced Raman scattering but cannot be directly observed using optical, electron, atomic force, or helium ion microscopy. When a Ag-grating-bearing pyrolyzed residue is introduced into a high-purity O2-depleted gas environment (Ar, N2, and CO2) and excited with 532 nm light, bright yellow luminescence emerges and is readily observed. Light emission is not observed without the pyrolytic carbon, without the excitation of plasmons, or in air or an Ar/O2 gas mixture. This process, driven by visible light and a nanostructured Ag surface bearing pyrolytic carbon, will be of interest to researchers involved in plasmonic catalysis, catalytic processes involving carbon, and luminescent plasmonic surfaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicCarbon and Quantum Dots ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207