Novel Controller Methodology for the Cessna Citation X Under Turbulence During Cruise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The design of a new control approach for the longitudinal motion of the Cessna Citation X during cruise is performed using a combination of sliding mode control (SMC) system, type 1 fuzzy logic system, and adaptive control system. This methodology is presented for 1) controlling the aircraft pitch rate and 2) stabilizing the aircraft speed during turbulence. The nonlinear model of the aircraft was generated using a simulation platform, which was designed based on flight data obtained from the highest Federal Aviation Administration–certified Level-D Research Aircraft Flight Simulator. The type 1 adaptive fuzzy logic system was implemented to approximate unknown functions for constructing the equivalent part of the SMC system that handled the effects of uncertainties and turbulence. The adaptation laws, derived from the Lyapunov theorem, were used to update the approximated functions in the control law at each flight condition and simulation iteration. Using the control systems combination, the pitch rate could follow the given reference signal, while the aircraft speed remained at a reference value with and without turbulence across the whole flight envelope. Results have shown that the proposed controllers satisfied tracking performance while generating smooth elevator deflection, both of which are important for real-aircraft applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".