MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403218310 · doi:10.19110/geov.2024.8.4

Dissymmetrization in eudialyte-group minerals. IV. Features of the blocky isomorphism in the structure of the Nb-deficient oneillite analogue in the frame of P3-symmetry

2024· article· en· W4403218310 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Р. К. Расцветаева, Н. В. Чуканов, V. M. Gridchina, Sergey M. Aksenov

Bibliographic record

VenueVestnik of Geosciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystallographyIsomorphism (crystallography)Group (periodic table)Crystal structureSymmetry operationSymmetry (geometry)ChemistryUnit (ring theory)Space (punctuation)Space groupCrystal (programming language)Materials sciencePhysicsMathematicsGeometryX-ray crystallographyComputer scienceDiffractionQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crystal structure of a potentially new member of the eudialyte group, the Nb-deficient analogue of oneillite from Mont Saint-Hilaire, Québec, Canada, with the idealized formula: Na13(Ca3Mn3)Zr3(Fe,Mn)3(,Nb)(Si,Nb,) [Si3O9]2[Si9O27]2(O,OH,Cl)3•2H2O, has been re-studied within the space group P3. The unit-cell parameters are: a = 14.134(3), c = 30.178(6) Å, V = 52201 Å3. The crystal structure of the mineral has been previously investigated using the space group R3 (typical for the members of oneillite family). In this work a structural model characterized by 155 crystallographic sites was solved in the frame of the low symmetry space group P3 and refined to R = 5.9 % using 4179 reflections with F > 2(F). The cation distribution between the key sites in low symmetry is more detailed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVestnik of GeosciencesSame topicCrystal Structures and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207