Self-Efficacy dan Dukungan Sosial dengan Quarter Life Crisis pada Karyawan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Each individual will be faced with personal questions such as jobs, salaries, positions and so on. Situations like these can affect individuals. Comparing other people's achievements, worrying about the future and feeling worried. If this happens at the age of 20-30 years it is called a quarter life crisis. This study aims to determine the relationship between self-efficacy and social support with quarter life crisis among employees at PT.X. This research is a quantitative study with a population of 277 employees using simple random sampling techniques so that this study involved 164 employees aged 20-30 years. Data collection uses 3 scales, namely the self-efficacy scale, social support scale and quarter life crisis scale. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.0 for windows with multiple regression analysis techniques. The results of the analysis show that the value of self-efficacy has a negative correlation of -0.668 with sig. 0.000 (<0.05) and the value of social support has a negative correlation of -0.469 with sig. 0.000 (<0.05). This shows that the higher the value of self-efficacy and social support, the lower the value of quarter life crisis, and vice versa. Setiap individu akan dihadapkan dengan pertanyaan-pertanyaan pribadi seperti pekerjaan, gaji, jabatan dan sebagainya. Keadaan seperti ini dapat mempengaruhi individu. Membandingkan pencapaian orang lain, cemas terhadap masa depan serta perasaan khawatir. Hal ini jika terjadi pada usia 20-30 tahun disebut dengan quarter life crisis. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan self-efficacy dan dukungan sosial dengan quarter life crisis pada kalangan karyawan di PT.X. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif yang dengan populasi penelitian sebanyak 277 karyawan dengan teknik pengambilan simple random sampling sehingga penelitian ini melibatkan 164 karyawan dengan usia 20-30 tahun. Pengambilan data menggunakan 3 skala yaitu skala self-efficacy, skala dukungan sosial dan skala quarter life crisis. Data tersebut dianalisis menggunakan SPSS version 16.0 for windows dengan teknik analisis regresi berganda. Hasil analisis menunjukan nilai self-efficacy memiliki korelasi negatif sebesar -0.668 dengan sig. 0.000 (<0.05) dan nilai dukungan sosial memiliki korelasi negatif sebesar -0.469 dengan sig. 0.000 (<0.05). Hal ini menunjukan bahwa semakin tinggi nilai self-efficacy dan dukungan sosial maka semakin rendah nilai quarter life crisis, dan juga sebaliknya.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".