MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403219460 · doi:10.11834/jig.210248

Video sequence-based human facial expression recognition using Transformer networks

2022· article· en· W4403219460 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Image and Graphics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTransformerFacial expressionArtificial intelligenceSequence (biology)Facial expression recognitionPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionFacial recognition systemEngineeringBiologyElectrical engineeringGeneticsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

目的相比于静态人脸表情图像识别,视频序列中的各帧人脸表情强度差异较大,并且含有中性表情的帧数较多,然而现有模型无法为视频序列中每帧图像分配合适的权重。为了充分利用视频序列中的时空维度信息和不同帧图像对视频表情识别的作用力差异特点,本文提出一种基于Transformer的视频序列表情识别方法。方法首先,将一个视频序列分成含有固定帧数的短视频片段,并采用深度残差网络对视频片段中的每帧图像学习出高层次的人脸表情特征,从而生成一个固定维度的视频片段空间特征。然后,通过设计合适的长短时记忆网络(long short-term memory network,LSTM)和Transformer模型分别从该视频片段空间特征序列中进一步学习出高层次的时间维度特征和注意力特征,并进行级联输入到全连接层,从而输出该视频片段的表情分类分数值。最后,将一个视频所有片段的表情分类分数值进行最大池化,实现该视频的最终表情分类任务。结果在公开的BAUM-1s(Bahcesehir University multimodal)和RML(Ryerson Multimedia Lab)视频情感数据集上的试验结果表明,该方法分别取得了60.72%和75.44%的正确识别率,优于其他对比方法的性能。结论该方法采用端到端的学习方式,能够有效提升视频序列表情识别性能。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it