The influence of talus size and shape on <i>in vivo</i> talocrural hopping kinematics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
talocrural function is poorly understood. Understanding these form-function relationships in a healthy cohort is essential for advancing patient-specific treatments aimed at restoring function. Nine participants (five females) hopped on one leg while biplanar videoradiography and ground reaction forces were simultaneously collected. Three-dimensional bone models were created from computed tomography scans. Helical axes of motion were calculated for the talus relative to the tibia (rotation axes), and a cylinder was fitted through the talar dome (morphological axis). Bland-Altman plots and spatial angles were used to examine the level of agreement between the rotation and morphological axes. A shape model of 36 (15 females) participants was established, and a cylinder fit was morphed through the range of ±3 standard deviations. The rotation and morphological axes largely agree regarding their orientation and location during hopping. The morphological axes were consistently oriented more anteriorly during landing than the rotation axes. Some shape components affect talar dome orientation and curvature independent of size. This suggests that besides bone size, the shape of the talar dome might influence the movement pattern during locomotion. Our findings may further inform talocrural joint arthroplasty design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".