Teaching materials for use in French classes for immigrants enrolled in Literacy Education and Second Language Learning for Adults in Quebec
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le personnel enseignant travaillant avec les personnes adultes immigrantes en apprentissage de la langue et de la littératie (PAIALeL) est confronté à plusieurs défis concernant la disponibilité et l’utilisation de matériels didactiques. Pour dresser le portrait du matériel utilisé dans les classes de français pour PAIALeL au Québec (Canada) et mieux comprendre les différents enjeux liés à l’utilisation de ce matériel, nous avons interrogé des enseignant·e·s en utilisant un questionnaire en ligne (n=53) et des entrevues individuelles (n=7). Nos données, analysées à l’aide de la théorie de l’activité (TA) révèlent un manque de matériel adéquat ainsi que des enjeux liés à l’adaptation et à la création de matériel ainsi qu’à l’hétérogénéité des profils des PAIALeL. Des implications pédagogiques sont aussi présentées. Teachers working in the field of literacy education and second language learning for adults (LESLLA) face several challenges related to the availability and use of appropriate teaching materials. To provide an overview of the materials used in Quebec’s French L2 classes and to better understand the challenges related to these materials, we collected data from teachers both through an online questionnaire (n=53) and individual interviews (n=7). Analysed through the lens of Activity Theory (AT), our data highlight a lack of suitable materials and issues related to the heterogeneity of students’ background. Pedagogical implications are also presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it