Influence of joint stiffness on three-dimensional deformation mechanisms of pipelines under tunnel active face instability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although extensive research has been conducted in literature to investigate tunnelling effects on pipelines, the performance of existing jointed pipelines subjected to excessive tunnel movement has not been investigated. This study sets out to examine the effects of tunnel active instability on three-dimensional deformation patterns of existing pipelines using physical model tests. Tunnelling induced ground/pipeline settlement, joint rotation, and bending strain under various horizontal tunnel face movements are systematically explored. Results show that the tunnel face pressure at the active limit state is practically independent of tunnel cover to diameter ratio ( C/D). Existing pipelines that fall within a range of 0.1 D–0.5 D ahead of the tunnel face experience excessive settlements, significant bending strains and joint rotations. The measured peak settlement of pipelines at 0.3 D in front of the tunnel face exceeds the allowable limit, and the maximum settlements in the jointed pipeline are up to 2.67 times those observed in the continuous pipeline. Meanwhile, the joint rotation angle and settlement induced in the jointed pipeline are greatly affected by the C/D ratio and decrease by up to 55.5% and 22.0%, respectively, with an increasing C/D ratio from 1.0 to 1.5.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".