Manufacturing Industry: A Sustainability Perspective On Cloud And Edge Computing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem is investigated through an analysis of the industrial use cases and sustainability of cloud and edge computing technologies.The study is carried out as a review of the literature, and industry-published materials are also employed to comprehend the demands of the market for these technologies.The findings suggest that manufacturing may achieve notable sustainability gains by leveraging cloud and edge computing for data analysis, automation, and cross-organizational cooperation.These consist of enhanced productivity, safety, quality, flexibility, and scalability as well as increased resource and energy efficiency.It is also possible to save costs and decrease waste and downtime.Studies indicate that cloud computing is a more energy-efficient and environmentally friendly option than localized servers.When opposed to centralized data centers, edge computing solutions provide reduced latency.Additionally, edge computing lowers expenses and energy usage by minimizing the quantity of data that has to be sent.The decentralization of cloud centre provides low-latency computing capabilities.This makes it possible to host latencysensitive apps that need more processing power than edge devices can provide.Furthermore, for non-compute-intensive application and centre can result in considerable energy and cost reductions.Applications requiring high computational latency and tolerance should be housed in bigger, centralized data centers with more processing power and energy efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.013 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".