Spontaneous imbibition in thin anisotropic fibrous media: Experiments and numerical modeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we investigate the temporal and spatial evolution of wetting saturation during spontaneous imbibition in anisotropic fibrous porous media using both experimental and numerical methods. We present a novel experimental approach to systematically study spontaneous imbibition in these media, allowing for a comprehensive assessment of how microstructure influences wicking performance. The experimental method, which exhibits high reproducibility, was used to validate the numerical model. The numerical model was parameterized using only the porosity and filament diameter of the porous media in conjunction with the material properties of the imbibing fluid. The essential capillary saturation curve for the numerical model was derived using the pore morphology method. The numerical results effectively replicated the experimental results. Our experimental and numerical observations revealed a diffusive wetting front within the porous media, which progressively expanded and decelerated during the imbibition process. The results highlight the significant influence of filament size on the wetting saturation dynamics and the height of the wetting front during spontaneous imbibition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".