MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Wine in Achaemenid Arachosia An Imperial Network of Regional Wines

2024· book-chapter· en· W4403230888 on OpenAlexaff
Johal Prabhjeet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Near East History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWineAncient historyArtHistoryVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay investigates the possible beginnings of viniculture in Arachosia, an Achaemenid satrapy in the southeastern end of the empire. It explores the idea of how in creating a consistent Achaemenid administrative system across the empire, new regional centres had to rapidly adopt practices that soon evolved to become the standard. One such practice was the use of wine for social, economic, and religious reasons as attested by various Achaemenid administrative texts from around the empire. I argue that it is within this context that we should understand the initiation or scaling up of viniculture around the empire including, and especially in, Arachosia. Arguably, the integration of Arachosia into the imperial network transforms the region into a holistic vinicultural landscape as seen through a shift in ceramics, the presence of certain building types, increased investment in irrigation at the site of Old Kandahar and also, most importantly, the mention of Arachosian wine in administrative texts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.846
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAncient Near East HistoryFrench-language works237,207