MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403238876 · doi:10.29313/bcses.v4i2.12520

Pengolahan Sampah dengan Alat Pembakar Sampah Tanpa Asap (APSTA) di Desa Ganeas Kabupaten Sumedang

2024· article· en· W4403238876 on OpenAlexaff
Etih Hartati, Waluyo, Bali Widodo

Bibliographic record

VenueBandung Conference Series Economics Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWaste Management and Recycling
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. One of the tridarma of higher education is community service. This article presents community service activities in Ganeas Village, Ganeas District, Sumedang Regency, West Java Province. The activities carried out in the form of counseling for the people of Ganeas Village were attended by mothers and fathers. The counseling material is in the form of an explanation of what waste is, types of waste, waste management objectives, waste reduction, handling, waste processing, smokeless waste burner (APSTA). The method of designing a smokeless waste burning device uses the assembly method of a smokeless waste burner. Tool assembly is putting together all the components that have been prepared and measured according to calculations so that they become a single unit of equipment that is ready to be operated. The use of APSTA is the right solution because with this tool there is no smoke that pollutes the environment. APSTA consists of components of a waste burning furnace equipped with a door to enter the garbage and ash collection room, motor, chimney, blower, water storage tank. The counseling was attended by about 45 women and 10 men. The results of this activity are the availability of APSTA technology, increasing community knowledge about APSTA and handling waste in Ganeas Village. Abstrak. Salah satu tridarma pergurian tinggi adalah pengabdian kepada masyarakat. Artikel ini menyajikan kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat, di Desa Ganeas Kecamatan Ganeas, Kabupaten Sumedang, Provinsi Jawa Barat. Kegiatan yang dilakukan berupa penyuluhan bagi masyarakat Desa Ganeas yang dihadiri oleh ibu-ibu dan bapak-bapak. Adapun materi penyuluhan berupa penjelasan tentang apa sampah itu, jenisnya sampah, tujuan pengelolaan sampah, pengurangan, penanganan, pengolahan sampah, alat pembakar sampah tanpa asap (APSTA). Metode perancangan alat pembakaran sampah tanpa asap menggunakan metode perakitan alat pembakar sampah tanpa asap. Perakitan alat adalah menyatukan seluruh komponen-komponen yang sudah disiapkan dan diukur sesuai perhitungan sehingga menjadi satu kesatuan alat yang siap untuk dioperasikan. Penggunaan APSTA adalah solusi tepat karena dengan alat tersebut tidak ada asap yang mencemari lingkungan. APSTA ini terdiri atas komponen-komponen tungku pembakar sampah yang dilengkapi dengan pintu untuk masuk sampah serta ruang penampung abu, motor, cerobong asap, blower, tangki penampung air. Penyuluhan dihadiri sekitar 45 ibu-ibu dan 10 bapak-bapak. Hasil dari kegiatan ini adalah tersedianya teknologi APSTA, meningkatnya pengetahuan masyarakat tentang APSTA dan tertanganinya sampah di Desa Ganeas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.519
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBandung Conference Series Economics StudiesSame topicWaste Management and RecyclingFrench-language works237,207