Kepuasan Masyarakat terhadap Kinerja Kawasan Taman Kota Manis sebagai Sarana Rekreasi Kota di Kota Pangkalan Bun
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. The Manis City Park area in Pangkalan Bun City is the only urban recreational facility located in the city center and serves the community on a city scale. However, the facilities in this area face several challenges, including issues of comfort, safety, accessibility and meaningfulness, which can affect people's interest in visiting. This study aims to assess the level of public satisfaction with the performance of Taman Kota Manis as an urban recreational facility. Primary data was collected through questionnaires distributed to 100 park visitors, and analysis was carried out using the Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) and Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) methods. The results of the IPA analysis show that there are four main attributes that require immediate attention, namely supporting facilities, the functioning of CCTV, lighting, and paths and facilities for disabilities. Other attributes, such as the placement of trash can facilities, the availability of security officers, and parking lots, are included in the "Maintain Achievement" category. Meanwhile, the results of the CSI analysis show that overall, the level of visitor satisfaction with the Manis City Park Area is 59.87%, which falls into the "Neutral" category. This study provides recommendations to park managers to improve facilities that are considered important by visitors, so as to increase community satisfaction and make the Manis City Park Area a more optimal recreational facility in the future. Abstrak. Kawasan Taman Kota Manis di Kota Pangkalan Bun merupakan satu-satunya sarana rekreasi kota yang terletak di pusat kota dan melayani masyarakat dalam skala kota. Namun, fasilitas di kawasan ini menghadapi beberapa tantangan, termasuk masalah kenyamanan, keamanan, aksesibilitas, dan kebermaknaan, yang dapat memengaruhi minat masyarakat untuk berkunjung. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai tingkat kepuasan masyarakat terhadap kinerja Kawasan Taman Kota Manis sebagai sarana rekreasi kota. Data primer dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner yang disebarkan kepada 100 pengunjung taman, dan analisis dilakukan menggunakan metode Importance Performance Analysis (IPA) dan Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI). Hasil analisis IPA menunjukkan bahwa terdapat empat atribut utama yang memerlukan perhatian segera, yaitu fasilitas pendukung, berfungsinya CCTV, lampu penerangan, serta jalur dan fasilitas untuk disabilitas. Atribut-atribut lain, seperti penempatan fasilitas tempat sampah, ketersediaan petugas keamanan, dan lahan parkir, termasuk dalam kategori "Pertahankan Prestasi". Sementara itu, hasil analisis CSI menunjukkan bahwa secara keseluruhan, tingkat kepuasan pengunjung terhadap Kawasan Taman Kota Manis adalah 59,87%, yang masuk dalam kategori "Netral". Penelitian ini memberikan rekomendasi kepada pengelola taman untuk meningkatkan fasilitas yang dianggap penting oleh pengunjung, sehingga dapat meningkatkan kepuasan masyarakat dan menjadikan Kawasan Taman Kota Manis sebagai sarana rekreasi yang lebih optimal di masa depan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".