Arahan Zonasi Kawasan Cagar Budaya Nagari Pariangan sebagai Kawasan Ancient Minangkabau Tourism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract. Pariangan Village is the oldest nagari in West Sumatra, the place of origin of the ancestors of the Minangkabau people. This Nagari has many cultural and cultural heritage buildings which are still held firmly by the community, so that in 2012 it was designated as one of the most beautiful villages in the world according to Budget Travel and in 2019 it was designated as Ancient Minangkabau Tourism. To protect cultural heritage buildings in this village from being damaged and to maintain their cultural values, it is necessary to carry out zoning activities for cultural heritage buildings. Therefore, this research was conducted to develop zoning directions for the Nagari Pariangan cultural heritage area as an Ancient Minangkabau Tourism area. This research uses an empirical qualitative approach method with descriptive analysis which refers to standard guidelines contained in primary and secondary data collection methods. The results of this research are that there are 4 zones, including the core zone with an area of 2.24 Ha, the buffer zone with an area of 6.43 Ha, the development zone with an area of 7.25 Ha and the supporting zone with an area of 25.14 Ha. Abstrak. Nagari Pariangan merupakan nagari tertua di Sumatera Barat, tempat asal usul nenek moyang masyarakat Minangkabau. Nagari ini memiliki banyak bangunan cagar budaya dan budaya yang masih dipegang teguh oleh masyarakat, sehingga pada tahun 2012 ditetapkan sebagai salah satu desa terindah di dunia versi Travel Budget dan pada tahun 2019 ditetapkan sebagai Ancient Minangkabau Tourism. Untuk melindungi bangunan cagar budaya di nagari ini agar tidak rusak dan mempertahankan nilai-nilai budayanya agar tetap terjaga, maka perlu dilakukan kegiatan zonasi bangunan cagar budaya. Maka dari itu diadakannya penelitian ini untuk menyusun arahan zonasi kawasan cagar budaya Nagari Pariangan sebagai kawasan Ancient Minangkabau Tourism. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan kualitatif empiris dengan analisis deskriptif yang mengacu pada standar pedoman yang terdapat dari metode pengumpulan data primer dan sekunder. Hasil dari penelitian ini yaitu terdapat 4 zona, meliputi zona inti dengan luas 2,24 Ha, zona penyangga dengan luas 6,43 Ha, zona pengembang dengan luas 7,25 ha dan zona penunjang dengan luas 25,14 Ha.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".