MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403239516 · doi:10.29313/bcsurp.v4i3.14708

Evaluasi Pengelolaan TPS 3R di Desa Cimalaka, Kecamatan Cimalaka, Kabupaten Sumedang

2024· article· en· W4403239516 on OpenAlexaff
Gina Oktaviani, Yulia Asyiawati

Bibliographic record

VenueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional Planning · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Growth and Fiscal Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The Reduce-Reuse-Recycle Waste Processing Site (TPS 3R) is a pattern of waste management approach on a communal or regional scale by involving the active role of the government and the community with a community empowerment approach. The TPS 3R in Cimalaka Village is no longer operating because there are several obstacles so that the Reuse-Reduce-Recycle process at this TPS can only produce one product in the form of compost fertilizer. In this study, to evaluate the TPS 3R waste management system in Cimalaka Village, it is necessary to adjust it to the TPS 3R criteria according to PERMEN PU No. 3 of 2013 using the ex-post evaluation approach, with a descriptive analysis method. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the TPS-3R of Cimalaka Village based on PERMEN PU No. 3 of 2013. The findings of this study are that the existence of the TPS 3R in Cimalaka has implemented the reuse, reduce, recycle process. The implementation of the 3R process is carried out by the Community Self-Help Group (KSM) which involves the village community as its workforce. Judging from the supporting facilities and infrastructure for the implementation of the 3R waste management system at TPS 3R Cimalaka, in general it has met the criteria of PERMEN PU No. 3 of 2013. There are several criteria that have not been met, namely the policy on technical instructions for managing TPS 3R is not yet available, the volume of residue transported to the TPA is still high, and the lack of community participation in managing TPS 3R. Therefore, what can be recommended in this study is to increase community participation in managing TPS 3R which is supported by increasing local government policies to consistently carry out coaching at TPS 3R Cimalaka by preparing technical instructions for managing TPS 3R. Abstrak. Tempat Pengolahan Sampah Reduce-Reuse-Recycle (TPS 3R) merupakan pola pendekatan pengelolaan persampahan pada skala komunal atau kawasan dengan mengikutsertakan peran aktif pemerintah dan masyarakat dengan pendekatan pemberdayaan masyarakat. TPS 3R yang ada di Desa Cimalaka sudah tidak beroperasi karena terdapat beberapa kendala sehingga proses Reuse-Reduce-Recycle pada TPS ini hanya dapat menghasilkan satu produk saja berupa pupuk kompos. Pada penelitian ini untuk mengevaluasi sistem pengelolaan sampah TPS 3R di Desa Cimalaka perlu menyesuaikan dengan kriteria TPS 3R menurut PERMEN PU No.3 Tahun 2013 menggunakan pendekatan ex-post evalution, dengan metode analisis deskriptif. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengevaluasi TPS-3R Desa Cimalaka berdasarkan PERMEN PU No.3 Tahun 2013. Temuan dari penelitian ini bahwa keberadaan TPS 3R yang terdapat di Cimalaka sudah dilaksanakan proses reuse, reduce, recycle. Pelaksanaan proses 3R dilakukan oleh Kelompok Swadaya Masyarakat (KSM) yang melibatkan masyarakat desa sebagai tenaga kerjanya. Dilihat dari sarana dan prasarana yang menunjang dari pelaksanaan sistem pengelolaan sampah 3R di TPS 3R Cimalaka pada umumnya sudah memenuhi kriteria PERMEN PU No. 3 Tahun 2013. Ada beberapa kriteria yang belum terpenuhi adalah kebijakan tentang petunjuk teknis pengelolaan TPS 3R belum tersedia, volume residu yang diangkut ke TPA masih tinggi, dan kurangnya partisipasi masyarakat dalam pengelolaan TPS 3R. Oleh karena itu, yang dapat direkomendasikan pada penelitian ini adalah meningkatkan partisipasi masyarakat dalam pengelolaan TPS f3R yang didukung oleh peningkatan kebijakan pemerintah daerah untuk konsisten melaksanakan pembinaan di TPS 3R Cimalaka dengan menyiapkan petunjuk teknis pengelolaan TPS 3R.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBandung Conference Series Urban & Regional PlanningSame topicEconomic Growth and Fiscal PoliciesFrench-language works237,207